The process your team does by hand is a system waiting to exist
The Work, With Specifics
Case studies are linked where they exist; the rest is named with its scope and nothing more
TuneRegistry
Music-rights registration is data entry against a dozen societies, each with its own format. We built the workflows and the data model that collect the information once and deliver clean data to every partner in the format each one requires. The manual re-keying is the part that stopped existing.
Project Foodie
A Django content system that treats a recipe as an event timeline rather than a document, so the editorial team could build an episode without an engineer in the loop. The automation was a schema decision.
RealKey
Mortgage processing runs on documents that arrive wrong. The platform's tooling coordinates loan officers and borrowers so collection and correction happen in the system instead of over email.
KION North America
Internal sales tools for a North American material-handling operation.
PartnerSlate
Marketplace workflows connecting food and beverage brands with production partners.
RoundTrip
Healthcare transportation software connecting operational teams and riders.
They were able to identify workarounds if the features we were thinking of integrating weren't possible.
What This Work Involves
What Actually Gets Automated
The pattern repeats across industries because the pain does.
Re-Keying Between Systems
Information that exists in one system, typed by hand into another. The most common automation we build, and usually the fastest to pay for itself.
Collection and Chasing
Forms, documents, approvals. The work is not the data; it is the follow-up. Software that owns the follow-up gives people their week back.
The Format Wars
Every partner wants the same information shaped differently. Model it once, generate every format, and the export stops being a person's job.
Automate the Right Things
The honest boundary: not everything should be automated.
A process that changes every month, or runs four times a year, or exists because a person is exercising judgment, is usually cheaper left alone. The first thing we do is say which parts of the process are actually software-shaped. Sometimes the answer shrinks the project, and we tell you that too.
The ones that are software-shaped stop consuming your team. That is the whole point.
They were able to execute everything they promised.
Is This You?
We're a good fit if: Your team runs a recurring manual process that everyone hates and nobody has time to fix, and you want it taken over by software your own people can live with.
We're not a good fit if: You want a library of no-code zaps maintained by nobody. We build systems your business can rely on, which is a different purchase.
Describe the Process
Tell us what your team does by hand and how often. We'll tell you which parts are software-shaped, and which parts we'd leave alone.